Powered by

The FAR Perspective On A New Landscape With Arizona’s Ricardo Valerdi & Oregon’s Joshua Gordon

Guest Ricardo Valerdi, Arizona; Joshua Gordon, Oregon
18:53 min watch

Summary

Arizona Faculty Athletics Representative Ricardo Valerdi and Oregon Faculty Athletics Representative Joshua Gordon join ADU’s Jason Belzer at the 2025 NCAA Convention to offer insight into the academic perspective on the new revenue-sharing, post-House athletics landscape. Valerdi and Gordon discuss the shift in the FAR’s role from representing the faculty to representing and advocating for the student-athletes; the sport-specific impact of conference realignment – specifically cross-country travel and its impact on academic performance; and the role of academics in the development of policies promoting competitive equity.

Gordon and Valerdi also speak to the impact of the transfer portal and NIL in the recruitment and retention process for student-athletes, advocating for the strategic use of online education and a re-imagining of the G.I. Bill that could allow athletes additional opportunities to focus on their sport and return to complete their degree.

Gordon on the decision-making process for potential athletes and their families: “It’s a combination of ‘You’re just a stop in our journey, you’re not the entirety of it’ and there are other factors that are probably more salient to their decision-making, probably NIL or potential rev-share as we move forward.”

The conversation is indexed below for efficient viewing (click the time stamp to jump to a specific question/topic).

  • - Under the assumption that the House settlement is approved, starting in the 2025-26 season, universities are going to share revenue with their student-athletes. How do you feel your job as the FAR has changed in the last couple of years and what are your biggest concerns moving forward in this new paradigm?
  • - Have you seen student-athletes coming to you and saying "This isn't working for me" referring to the new cross-country travel due to realignment?
  • - Do you believe that academics still comes first compared to NIL, especially for athletes in revenue-generating sports like football and basketball? Specifically in the decision of where to attend school?
  • - How do we rectify this issue of the student-athlete experience when students are not thinking about where they go to school, the fact that many will transfer multiple times. Your job is to facilitate whether these athletes are learning anything. What is the answer in the short term and is there a reconsideration that we need to make around how athletes are treated in the larger higher education ecosystem?
  • - What would you do away with or try to add to improve the current system?
  • - We put these rules and regulations in the hopes of keeping these athletes more like students but we don't treat athletes like everyone else on campus.
  • - What is one thing you hope 10 years from now looking back that we were able to solve for at this critical juncture?