Powered by

Leading Through An Inflection Point With Georgia’s Josh Brooks

Guest Josh Brooks, Georgia
18:21 min watch

Summary

University of Georgia J. Reid Parker Director of Athletics Josh Brooks sits down with ADU’s Jason Belzer at the 2025 NCAA Convention to reflect on the current inflection point within college athletics, including issues related to NIL, revenue sharing and the professionalization of the collegiate model. Throughout the changes and uncertainty, Brooks holds close to the core values of his department and remembers the importance of being nimble: “We’re not in a position to close any doors right now… we’ve got to keep all our options on the table.”

Brooks and Belzer also dive into how to assess talent in a more professionalized model, noting there will inevitably be a talent gap in both the administrative and coaching ranks, as well as the nuances of accepting private equity support, with Brooks cautioning: “You have to be careful what you’re signing up for. We do value broad-based programming; we value 21 sports at Georgia. We value being successful in those 21 sports. We value supporting over 500 student-athletes… it’s not just about the revenue-producing sports. When you go down that pathway, you don’t know what the next step is.”

The conversation is indexed below for efficient viewing (click the time stamp to jump to a specific question/topic).

  • - We are at an inflection point in college athletics and a new paradigm is coming with revenue share. How has UGA navigated the last few years with NIL and has that strategy changed as you look at what college athletics will be in the next few years?
  • - We're transitioning from the NIL collective era to schools directly paying athletes. How do you decide what trends make sense to follow and ensure that you're in the best possible position when you don't know how things will play out in the future?
  • - As we move into this new future, some people think it might not make sense to continue having an NIL collective; yet having a collective or offering opportunities above or beyond what a school can provide might be a differentiator.
  • - Teams are moving towards a professional, "front office" model. There will certainly be a talent gap at the administrative level. How have you navigated that and assessed administrative and coaching talent?
  • - The ability for athletes to transfer multiple times is challenging. How do you drive your mission in an environment like that?
  • - There's talk about private equity, so that the "have nots" can be competitive with the "haves." What is your take on that and why is it maybe not as simple as some people make it out to be?
  • - Do you think there's a place for co-investment - conversations like the creation of superleagues or aggregating media rights?
  • - Imagine we're sitting here 10 years from now and things turned out the way you want them to. What does college athletics look like?
  • - Do you hope that that competitive balance that exists today still is there?