Four months into the Name, Image and Likeness era, INFLCR has aggregated and analyzed its transaction data. With over 200 Division I partners, over 5,000 transactions have been reported to the INFLCR Verified platform.
Powered by
Measuring The First 100 Days Of Name, Image and Likeness
Articles
Royalty Income Payments Won’t Solve The International Student Athlete Employment Issue
As colleges and universities prepare to implement the House v. NCAA settlement, stakeholders across athletics, compliance, and legal affairs are tasked with navigating complex regulatory terrain. At the center of the conversation is a question with significant operational and legal ramifications: can payments to student-athletes under this settlement be lawfully classified as “royalty income”—especially when
Articles
Why Direct Student-Athlete Payments Create An Immigration Crisis For Universities
The intersection of NIL (name, image, likeness) and immigration law has become one of the most pressing and complex challenges facing collegiate athletics today. The provisionally approved settlement in House v. NCAA, which proposes direct revenue-sharing of $21–22 million per school, coupled with the growing number of States that have passed laws authorizing higher education
Articles
What Will College Athletic Department Revenue-Sharing Look Like?
College athletic departments are preparing for U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken to potentially provide final approval of the settlement in the House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA and Carter v. NCAA cases, which would allow for direct revenue sharing with athletes later this year. While many administrators have publicly expressed their school’s intent to participate,